709
Comment:

← Revision 16 as of 20210608 17:57:55 ⇥
1373

Deletions are marked like this.  Additions are marked like this. 
Line 6:  Line 6: 
A smear function to try:  A position dither function to try: 
Line 8:  Line 8: 
$ D = \lambda/2 $ $ k = 2 \pi / N * L $ 
<:3> $ D = L/2 $ <:3> $ k = 2 \pi / N * L $   $ \Delta x = D * ( \sin( k z ) + \cos( k y ) ) $  <2> $ \Delta y = D * ( \sin( k x ) + \cos( k z ) ) $   $ \Delta z = D * ( \sin( k y ) + \cos( k x ) ) $  
Line 11:  Line 11: 
$ \delta x = D * ( \sin( k z ) + \cos( k y ) ) $ $ \delta y = D * ( \sin( k x ) + \cos( k z ) ) $ $ \delta z = D * ( \sin( k y ) + \cos( k x ) ) $ 
... or some variation of that ( I originally tried $ D = \lambda/2 $ , with little effect). This assumes the spacing $ L >> \lambda $, a sparse array, so that the antennas do not couple (much). Try scaling D and k, and also modifying amplitudes across the array like a Hamming window, and see how that changes the sidelobes. 
Line 15:  Line 14: 
... or some variation of that. This assumes the spacing $ L >> \lambda $, a sparse array, so that the antennas do not couple (much). We can scale D and k, and also modify amplitudes across the array like a Hamming window, and see how that changes the sidelobes. 
This happens on top of the array of perhaps hundreds of emitters on the thinsat itself, which beamforms to a few degrees of angle, reducing power splattered far from the target. 
Line 18:  Line 17: 
MORE LATER  The signal is broadband, so there is not a well defined $ \lambda $. We may end up making k a function of x, y, and z as well. == 5x5x5 skewed, dithered array == {{ a4d21.png   height=768 }} Annotated version with explanation coming soon. == 16x16x16 skewed, dithered array == {{ a4d2116.png   height=768 }} Annotated version with explanation coming soon. MoreLater 
Array Phasing
When we randomly dither the position of the emitters in a 3 dimensional phased array, it smears out the grating lobes. I am looking for a better function.
A position dither function to try:
D = L/2 
k = 2 \pi / N * L 

\Delta x = D * ( \sin( k z ) + \cos( k y ) ) 

\Delta y = D * ( \sin( k x ) + \cos( k z ) ) 

\Delta z = D * ( \sin( k y ) + \cos( k x ) ) 
... or some variation of that ( I originally tried D = \lambda/2 , with little effect). This assumes the spacing L >> \lambda , a sparse array, so that the antennas do not couple (much). Try scaling D and k, and also modifying amplitudes across the array like a Hamming window, and see how that changes the sidelobes.
This happens on top of the array of perhaps hundreds of emitters on the thinsat itself, which beamforms to a few degrees of angle, reducing power splattered far from the target.
The signal is broadband, so there is not a well defined \lambda . We may end up making k a function of x, y, and z as well.
5x5x5 skewed, dithered array
Annotated version with explanation coming soon.
16x16x16 skewed, dithered array
Annotated version with explanation coming soon.