Differences between revisions 5 and 28 (spanning 23 versions)
Revision 5 as of 2013-02-12 15:24:11
Size: 19197
Comment:
Revision 28 as of 2013-02-15 23:10:30
Size: 20496
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
---- -----
Line 6: Line 6:
 . [[ attachment:ss.pdf ]] last updated 2013 Feb 10 at 7pm PST
 . [[ attachment:ss.tex ]] last updated 2013 Feb 10 at 7pm PST
----
 . [[ attachment:ss.pdf | Poster presentation, 4 page PDF, 14.3MB ]] last updated 2013 Feb 13 at 3pm PST
 . [[ attachment:ss.tex | LaTeX source file ]] last updated 2013 Feb 13 at 3pm PST
 . You can find the images in the [[ http://server-sky.com/Brown2013?action=AttachFile | Attachments ]]. Some are large. Best viewed at 300dpi .
 . This page is a work in progress, and was imperfectly translated from the LaTeX source file. Please look at the PDF for the most accurate version. I will make more links to references Real Soon Now.

-----
Line 25: Line 28:
=== Abstract === == Abstract ==
Line 37: Line 40:
-----
Line 38: Line 42:
=== Introduction === == Introduction ==
Line 53: Line 57:
much quicker and cheaper than satellite avionics. more quickly and cheaply than satellite avionics.
Line 60: Line 64:
of cooperative objects, working together like mesh wifi or cell phone of cooperative objects, working together like mesh Wi-Fi or cell phone
Line 64: Line 68:
and networked like cell phones, optimized for the space environment?. and networked like cell phones, optimized for the space environment?'''

-----
Line 67: Line 72:
=== Space Power for Computation and Radio === == Space Power for Computation and Radio ==
Line 78: Line 83:
campus) co.ed to that small marble. With all that high quality, campus) compared to that small marble. With all that high quality,
Line 85: Line 90:
energy, __in space?__'''. energy, ''in space?'' '''.
Line 88: Line 93:
 . photo of Google data center, The Dalles, Oregon, taken by author ca. 2008
Line 103: Line 109:
-----
Line 104: Line 111:
=== Thinsats === == Thinsats ==
Line 145: Line 152:
-----
Line 146: Line 154:
=== Light Pressure === == Light Pressure ==
Line 159: Line 167:
Line 162: Line 169:
Line 164: Line 170:
deliver $ approx $ 20 nanonewtons of average thrust, throttleable deliver $ \approx $ 20 nanonewtons of average thrust, throttleable
Line 223: Line 229:
-----
Line 224: Line 231:
=== The M288 orbit === == The M288 orbit ==
Line 227: Line 234:
 . population histogram: [[http://www.radicalcartography.net/index.html?histpop]], thank you for permission from Bill Rankin . . . [[attachment:pc02.c]] program to add coverage curves
Line 230: Line 238:
 M288 is a compromise between northern latitude visibility M288 is a compromise between northern latitude visibility
Line 232: Line 240:
Most of the world's population is south of 55° N .

The M480 orbit (three repeats per day) is visible farther north,
but ping time is slower and launch $ \Delta V $ is higher.
The M720 orbit is occupied by GPS and Glosnass,
and the M360 orbit is slated for the O3B satellites.
Both M360 and M480 are close to the 15000km light pressure instability.
Most of the world's population is south of 55°N .

The M480 orbit (three repeats per day) is visible farther north, but ping time is slower and launch $ \Delta V $ is higher.  The M720 orbit is occupied by GPS and Glosnass, and the M360 orbit is slated for the O3B satellites. Both M360 and M480 are close to the 15000km light pressure instability.
Line 241: Line 245:

The NORAD spacewatch database lists about 13000 tracked objects.
The population of tracked objects drops rapidly with altitude.
The flux rate drops faster, as equatorial plane crossings are
spread out over a larger orbital radius and longer orbital periods.

Equatorial orbits have lower average closing velocities with objects
in inclined orbits. Objects in opposing polar orbits can close with
each other at twice orbital velocity.
 . [[attachment:crosser.pl|crosser.pl]] . [[attachment:crosser.gp|crosser.gp]] you will need perl, gnuplot, and a subscription to the [[ https://www.space-track.org/ | spacetrack database]]

The NORAD spacewatch database lists about 13000 tracked objects.  The population of tracked objects drops rapidly with altitude. The flux rate drops faster, as equatorial plane crossings are spread out over a larger orbital radius and longer orbital periods.

Equatorial orbits have lower average closing velocities with objects in inclined orbits. Objects in opposing polar orbits can close with each other at twice orbital velocity.
Line 253: Line 253:
The sidereal period of an Earth orbit is $ T = 2 pi sqrt{ a^3 / mu } $, where $ a $ is the semimajor
axis and $ \mu $ is the Earth's gravitational.ameter.
'''The period is the same for all orbits with the same
semimajor axis.'''

We can map many elliptical orbits with identical periods onto a toroid
around a central orbit, packing them closely with no chance of high speed
collisions between them.

3 dimensional arrays mapped onto these orbits will skew towards
apogee as they move around the orbit, and also make one rotation
around their center orbit axis as they make one orbit.
The sidereal period of an Earth orbit is $ T = 2 \pi \sqrt{ a^3 / \mu } $, where $ a $ is the semimajor axis and $ \mu $ is the Earth's gravitational parameter.  '''The period is the same for all orbits with the same semimajor axis.'''

We can map many elliptical orbits with identical periods onto a toroid around a central orbit, packing them closely with no chance of high speed collisions between them.

3 dimensional arrays mapped onto these orbits will skew towards apogee as they move around the orbit, and also make one rotation around their center orbit axis as they make one orbit.

-----
Line 267: Line 261:
=== Cooling and Temperature stress === == Cooling and Temperature stress ==
Line 281: Line 275:
-----
Line 282: Line 277:
=== Radiation === == Radiation ==
Line 289: Line 284:

Ionizing.ticles can cause latch-up, but not at modern power
 . graph source [[http://radhome.gsfc.nasa.gov/radhome/papers/SC_nsrec97.pdf]] quoting Gussenhoven, IEEE Trans on Nuclear Science Vol 43 no 2 April 1996

Ionizing particles can cause latch-up, but not at modern power
Line 316: Line 312:
-----
Line 317: Line 314:
=== Phased Array Radio === == Phased Array Radio ==
Line 340: Line 337:
-----
Line 341: Line 339:
=== Tracking space debris, recycling rocket tanks === == Tracking space debris, recycling rocket tanks ==
Line 378: Line 376:
-----
Line 379: Line 378:
=== Capturing ballast mass === == Capturing ballast mass ==
Line 383: Line 382:
Line 385: Line 383:
then recycle or re-enter them. NORAD tracks 1500+ spent upper
stages, with acres of aluminum tank.
then recycle or re-enter them. [[ https://www.space-track.org/ | NORAD ]]
tracks 1500+ spent upper stages, with acres of aluminum tank.
Line 396: Line 394:
orbits accessible to electrodynamic tether EDDE capture systems. orbits accessible to [[ www.star-tech-inc.com/papers/edde/edde.pdf | electrodynamic tether EDDE capture systems.]]
Line 400: Line 398:
as well as detect and characterize potential tether-cutting
colliders.
as well as detect and characterize potential tether-cutting colliders.

-----
Line 404: Line 402:
=== Conclusion === == Conclusion ==
Line 411: Line 409:
The spirit of Moore's law, providing exponentially increasing
computing value per dollar, can continue in space for decades.
The spirit of [[http://server-sky.com/MooresEnergy | Moore's law]],
providing exponentially increasing computing value per dollar,
can continue in space for decades.
Line 416: Line 415:
Rocket designs are already optimized. Most re-use proposals are
misconceived, trading expensive payload mass fraction and complicated
logistics for cheap tank aluminum.
Rocket designs are already optimized.
Most re-use proposals are misconceived,
trading expensive payload mass fraction and complicated logistics for cheap tank aluminum.
Line 420: Line 419:
launches will reduce launch costs, but Tsiolkovsky's exponential
law will always make fuel-carrying launchers more expensive than
launches will [[ http://server-sky.com/SpaceX | reduce launch costs]],
but Tsiolkovsky's exponential law will always make fuel-carrying launchers more expensive than
Line 429: Line 428:
as the space cable and the launch loop. When space solar power
provides terrestrial grid power to launch more space solar power
as the [[http://spacecable.org.uk|space cable]] and the [[http://launchloop.com|launch loop]].
When space solar power provides terrestrial grid power to launch more space solar power


2013 Space Horizons Conference Poster

Brown University, February 20 - 21


A0_title.jpg

Abstract

Paper thin satellites, precisely positioned by light pressure on switchable mirrors, self-assemble into megawatt arrays. Solid state technology advances permit robust survivability in high radiation. Applications include internet for the developing world, and centimeter-accurate space debris tracking.

large Stable operation in earth orbit limits the area to mass ratio. Ballast mass, scavenged from derelict rocket tanks, can minimize launch weight while reducing space debris.


Introduction

Most satellites convert solar power and information into signals transmitted to receivers on earth.

In essence, a satellite is a surface that collects solar energy, connected by sensors and computation to another surface directing radio energy into a narrow beam. Efficient satellites do this with the minimum possible mass.

Currently, satellites are built like aircraft, manually, from "proven" (obsolete) components in small batches. Consumer electronics are mass produced on automated manufacturing lines, packing bleeding edge technology into smaller and cheaper packages. Careful design and quality materials produce high reliability, feature-rich products more quickly and cheaply than satellite avionics.

Small transistors and wires save power. Billions of transistors replace software algorithms with optimized special purpose hardware, more immune to errors and radiation upsets.

Low cost mass produced semiconductors permit vast distributed systems of cooperative objects, working together like mesh Wi-Fi or cell phone networks, replacing the centralized resources of the past.

What if satellites got a solid state makeover, mass produced and networked like cell phones, optimized for the space environment?


Space Power for Computation and Radio

C0_world_marble.png

As poverty diminishes worldwide, world power demand skyrockets. The earth intercepts 170,000 terawatts. Nature evolved to use most of the terawatts reaching land.

The sun emits 380 trillion TW into empty space. If 170,000 TW was proportional to a marble, the sun's total output is proportional to 212 acres (50% larger than the Brown University campus) compared to that small marble. With all that high quality, continuous power going to waste, why should we diminish nature's share of that tiny marble?

Data centers consume 3% of US base load generation, and the fraction grows rapidly, in spite of efficiency improvements. What if we power future data center growth with space solar energy, in space? .

C3_energy.png

  • photo of Google data center, The Dalles, Oregon, taken by author ca. 2008

Terrestrial data centers require cases, racks, cabling, power conversion, cooling, buildings, land, transmission lines, power plants, fuel, and continental-scale optical fiber networks. If we deliver space solar power to the terrestrial grid, we add huge transmitters and rectennas.

Computers in space don't need all that. With reliable sunlight and a deep space heat sink, they need little more than solar cells, silicon chips, circuit board runs, and gossamer structure to hold them together in microgravity. Data from space can be delivered anywhere on earth: ships, aircraft, remote sensors, temporary outposts and remote villages, and also to other satellites in orbit.


Thinsats

B0_serversatV3a.png

Very thin satellites ("thinsats") maximize power with minimal launch weight. Large area thinsats can share resources such as time references and maneuvering, and use narrow-beam phased-array techniques. Too light, and orbit eccentricity must be high to compensate for light pressure, interfering with other orbits. Too wide, and pitch/yaw turns are slow, and gravity gradient torques are difficult to correct. Reasonable dimensions are 20 centimeters across, and 8 m2/kg.

One thinsat is almost useless, but large arrays can out-perform multi-ton satellites. Server sky thinsats weigh three grams, so an array of 33,000 thinsats weighs 99 kilograms, and makes 100kW of power from sunlight, 100 times the power to weight ratio of a big comsat. Thinsats deploy into constellations 100 meters across or larger. Over time, arrays can grow or shrink, change shape, or be reprogrammed for different functions. There is no upper limit on array size, though large arrays must be sparse so radio signals and sunlight can penetrate them.

Thinsat substrates are circuit boards made from triangular sheets of glass, with shaped surface cavities holding strips of indium phosphide solar cells and silicon integrated circuits such as processors, memories, and radios. The ground plane on the back side will have arrays of hundreds of radio chips, each surrounded by slotted antennas. Multilayer circuit board traces thread between the slots.

Glass is inexpensive, transparent, insulating, radiation and UV resistant, and moldable into complex shapes. Thinsat fragility is unimportant in microgravity.

Launch is stressful, so thinsats are densely stacked for launch, as strong as a cylinder of glass. Thinsats are formed with slight curvatures, actually two different curvatures that alternate in the stack like Belleville springs. This creates a small force that gently pushes them apart when they deploy from the stack in orbit.par

M3_deploy.png


Light Pressure

The thinsat corners are three large switchable mirrors acting as thrusters. The mirrors are thin films of electrochromic material, which switch between transparent and reflective in fractions of a second, using a solid-solution electroplating process. Light pressure is 4.56 μ N/m2. Pass-through light creates no force, reflected light creates double the force. Thinsats are mostly opaque, with constant thrust, but the thrusters allow individual thinsats to maneuver relative to their neighbors, and turn sideways to the sun, changing incoming light pressure, and creating sideways forces.

I0_echrome.png

Three 5cm corner thrusters on a 3 gram thinsat weigh 600mg and deliver \approx 20 nanonewtons of average thrust, throttleable to a fraction of a nanonewton over a fraction of a second. The thruster I_{SP} is 10,000 seconds for 10 years in orbit.

Thrusters are segmented, allowing fine tuning of the thrust, and increasing survivability to micrometeoroid punctures.

The thruster acceleration for a sun-oriented 3 gram thinsat averages 7 μ m/s2. Turns between sun-oriented and 60° sideways can produce an additional 6 μ m/s2 of acceleration over an orbit for long distance maneuvers.

Start and

Thrust

Distance

stop time

fraction

moved

0.2 sec

0.1

7 nm

optical position tweak

1.0 sec

1.0

1.7μm

microwave position tweak

6 min

1.0

20 cm

occultation avoidance

30 min

1.0

5 m

precision debris avoidance

7 hours

1.0

1 km

crude debris avoidance

6 days

1.0

444 km

1 degree around m288 orbit

41 days

1.8

40,000 km

180° around m288 orbit

Thinsats are torqued and turned with differences between thrusters, accelerating one side of the thinsat differently than the other side. A 20 cm thinsat can make a 45° turn and stop in 6 minutes.

J3_turn_tidal.png

Continuous torque is required to counteract tidal forces. The only stable position for a thinsat is edge-on to the center of the earth. Continuous sun orientation requires torques at the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions of the orbit. Light pressure cannot correct the gravitational torque of thick and heavy thinsats.

K0_lighteccentric.png

Light pressure can destabilize orbits. Light pressure subtracts \Delta V from the sunbound side of the orbit, and adds \Delta V to the the outbound side. This modifies a circular orbit into an ellipse, driving apogee and perigee perpendicular to the sun. If this change in eccentricity is added to an ellipse with a sunwards perigee, the eccentricity and the orbit will precess eastward. A properly chosen elliptical orbit precesses {360°} per year, with perigee following the sun through the sky.

The oblate earth adds a J_2/R^3 term to the gravity field, also precessing perigee eastward, 360° per year at 15000km radius. Below this altitude, the precession is too fast, so light pressure precession is subtracted using a sunwards apogee. Above 15000km, light pressure precession dominates, and a sunward perigee orbit should be chosen. Higher orbits have lower orbital speeds, so light pressure has a greater effect, and the orbit must be more elliptical to compensate.


The M288 orbit

E0_m288xx.png

The 12789 km radius M288 orbit makes exactly 5 orbits per day relative to the ground, for a 288 minute ground repeat time. M288 is a compromise between northern latitude visibility (55°) and round trip ping time. Most of the world's population is south of 55°N .

The M480 orbit (three repeats per day) is visible farther north, but ping time is slower and launch \Delta V is higher. The M720 orbit is occupied by GPS and Glosnass, and the M360 orbit is slated for the O3B satellites. Both M360 and M480 are close to the 15000km light pressure instability.

E3_crosser.png

The NORAD spacewatch database lists about 13000 tracked objects. The population of tracked objects drops rapidly with altitude. The flux rate drops faster, as equatorial plane crossings are spread out over a larger orbital radius and longer orbital periods.

Equatorial orbits have lower average closing velocities with objects in inclined orbits. Objects in opposing polar orbits can close with each other at twice orbital velocity.

H0_toroid.png

The sidereal period of an Earth orbit is T = 2 \pi \sqrt{ a^3 / \mu } , where a is the semimajor axis and \mu is the Earth's gravitational parameter. The period is the same for all orbits with the same semimajor axis.

We can map many elliptical orbits with identical periods onto a toroid around a central orbit, packing them closely with no chance of high speed collisions between them.

3 dimensional arrays mapped onto these orbits will skew towards apogee as they move around the orbit, and also make one rotation around their center orbit axis as they make one orbit.


Cooling and Temperature stress

M0_temperature.png

M288 objects spend 40 minutes per orbit in solar eclipse, without power. Their high surface-to-volume ratio makes them cool rapidly by black body radiation, reaching equilibrium with deep space and Earth's night sky infrared emissions.

Since the materials have different thermal expansion properties, there will be thermal stresses between objects and on wiring and connections. Differences between average front and back side expansion can cause curling and warping of thinsats.


Radiation

The M288 orbit is in the van Allen belt. Thinsats are unshielded, so electronics and solar cells get huge radiation doses. Recent semiconductor advances provide solutions.

R0_radiation.png

Ionizing particles can cause latch-up, but not at modern power supply voltages below 1 volt. Particle hits can flip bits, but RAZOR "detect error and recompute" techniques can compensate, while increasing power performance.

R3_radiation.png

Annealing, briefly cooking the semiconductor lattice, can heal displacement damage caused by high energy.ticles. Lateral thermal conductivity through the very thin substrate does not spread heat, so all 4 watts of a chipsat can be redirected to heat one small region above 400C. The figure shows the heating of one of the solid state memory chips.

Gate charge trap effects can be almost eliminated by the new Intel hafnium oxide process. Particle tracks leave a trail of trapped electrons in the HfO film, and a compensating track of trapped holes in the SiO_2 beneath it. Such transistors withstand doses of many megarads without noticable voltage threshold shifts.

Thin, graded junction indium phosphide solar cells are rad hard, as are highly-doped deep submicron transistors. Thinsats contain no radiation-and-UV-sensitive plastics. Other materials will need evaluation.


Phased Array Radio

Q0_phasedarray.png

Phased array transmitters sum the signals from many precisely timed emitters to form a beam. Electronically changing the phase of the emitters steers the beam in nanoseconds. A 100 kg array with 33,000 3 gram thinsats and spread out over 100 meters can focus kilowatt pulses onto a ground spot 1 km wide and 10,000 km distant. Thousands of different pulses in different directions can be emitted simultaneously, by superposition.

Q3_arrayspace.png

Averaging over thousands of emitters results in tight and accurate power beams. However, a regular array that is widely spread out sprays 99% of the energy in all directions, and focuses some of it into grating lobes, making high power interference in the wrong places. Intentionally dithering thinsat positions into a non-uniform grid smears out interference, reducing peaks to acceptable levels.


Tracking space debris, recycling rocket tanks

U0_radar.png

Modern radars emit chirps, complex pulses spread in time and frequency, with receivers correlating the return energy to the chirps. This detects much lower amplitude signals with high timing accuracy.

Many server sky arrays can be synchronized and focus narrow-band continuous microwave energy on a small volume of near-earth space, creating three dimensional interference patterns, standing waves in space. As an object orbits through that volume, the energy it reflects will be modulated by the changing field, creating a time-varying return similar to a radar chirp. Different objects in different orbits will emit different signatures, and a powerful.allel computation engine can correlate for all the expected signatures simultaneously.

The drawing above shows seven widely s.ated arrays looking at a half-kilometer region of space with centimeter resolution. Compacting the arrays expands the search region, and closing the orbital separation between arrays looks for larger objects. Once objects are identified and their rough orbital.ameters tracked, we can use other array configurations to characterize object position and velocity to centimeter accuracy, measuring tumble and estimating mass from the long term response to drag and light pressure.

Server sky can use this expanded collider database to plan maneuvers long in advance. But a large database will also protect big satellites with limited maneuvering fuel. When we can precisely predict where billions of large and small colliders will be, we can make tiny micrometer-per-second thrusts on the big birds, confident of a 10 meter miss six months in the future. Today, NORAD tracks larger objects with kilometer short-term accuracy, only marginally useful for avoidance maneuvers.


Capturing ballast mass

U3_rocketbody.png

Instead of mere avoidance, we can collect the derelict objects, then recycle or re-enter them. NORAD tracks 1500+ spent upper stages, with acres of aluminum tank.

Specialized satellites with high I_{SP} VASIMR thrusters and powerful lasers can cut the skins and tanks into penny-sized ballast mass for future ultra-thinsats. The ballasts are ferried to M288 to attach to new ultralight thinsats. Every kilogram delivered to M288 with fuel-efficient space tugs enables an extra kilowatt of ultra-thinsat.

Many of those rocket bodies are far from M288, in LEO and MEO orbits accessible to electrodynamic tether EDDE capture systems. Those objects can be collected into "junkyards" in low orbit for other re-uses, or de-orbited and re-entered. Accurate server sky radar will help mission planning for EDDE as well as detect and characterize potential tether-cutting colliders.


Conclusion

S0_costdrop.png

The spectacular transistor density increases driving Moore's Law are slowing; computing cost is now driven by energy costs, not transistor cost. The spirit of Moore's law, providing exponentially increasing computing value per dollar, can continue in space for decades. Space energy is unbounded, and the cost of collecting it will drop with efficiency improvements, mass reductions, and launch cost reductions.

Rocket designs are already optimized. Most re-use proposals are misconceived, trading expensive payload mass fraction and complicated logistics for cheap tank aluminum. Logistic improvements from scheduled high traffic expendable launches will reduce launch costs, but Tsiolkovsky's exponential law will always make fuel-carrying launchers more expensive than the resulting payload energy.

Server sky greatly increases the productivity of a kilogram in orbit, making hundreds of launches a day economically attractive. That creates a market for electrically powered alternatives to rockets, such as the coilgun launcher prototypes built by E. F. Northrup in the 1930's, or more recent proposals such as the space cable and the launch loop. When space solar power provides terrestrial grid power to launch more space solar power collection systems, power costs will drop and launch capability will grow exponentially, while reducing the environmental costs of global abundance.

Brown2013 (last edited 2021-05-20 22:26:56 by KeithLofstrom)