Differences between revisions 11 and 12
Revision 11 as of 2015-08-05 22:40:38
Size: 2909
Comment:
Revision 12 as of 2015-08-05 22:41:29
Size: 2967
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 12: Line 12:
Copernicus was a polymath, but his day job was physician. If he could advise us today, I imagine his first prescription would be to eat healthy, exercise, and pray. After that, his "principle" might be to cherish God's creation by studying the sky and helping other people. I am agnostic - I am not a "principled Copernican" - but I object to those who would twist his ideas 180 degrees, assuming his historical views are irrelevant. It is an intellectual crime to rewrite the past so we can pretend to agree with it. Copernicus was a polymath, but his day job was physician. If he could advise us today, I imagine his first prescription would be to eat healthy, exercise, and pray. After that, his "principle" might be to cherish God's creation by studying the sky and helping other people. I am agnostic - I am not a "principled Copernican" - but I object to those who would twist his ideas 180 degrees, assuming his historical views (especially his faith and his many other accomplishments) are irrelevant. It is an intellectual crime to rewrite the past so we can pretend to agree with it.

The Copernican "Principle"

What Would Copernicus Say?


The actual "Copernican principle" as implied by Nicolas Copernicus (in Commentariolus around 1514 and the 1543 De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium) is merely that the planets revolve around the Sun, the earth is another planet that rotates, and that the stars are very far away. That idea was extended by Newtonian physics 200 years later, and Laplace 100 years after that. It was only in 1838 that Friedrich Bessel first measured stellar parallax, proving (what was already widely believed) that the stars were not embedded in some distant sphere. The Copernican "Principle" is a recent, and temporary, intellectual fad.

Copernicus did NOT claim that human beings were not special, merely that mathematical reasoning based on observation did not physically place them 6400 km above the geometric center of the universe. My guess (I don't read Latin) is that Copernicus placed man spiritually close to God, far more important than physical location.

Copernicus made no claims that the far universe resembles the nearby one - that "principle" was extrapolation by others, centuries later. Copernicus rearranged our conceptions, and helped us gain the perspective that permits the contemplation of a uniform universe. What we are learning today is that the laws of physics are universal and simple, but their observable consequences in an evolving and varied universe are anything but simple. The Kepler space telescope has found thousands of very different planetary systems, none resembling ours. To paraphrase another iconified thinker, God plays dice with the universe at every scale. The universe is not Levittown.

The phrase "Copernican principle" has been appropriated by successive "philosophers" of science, most recently by Carl Sagan, to support worldviews that the devout Catholic canon Copernicus might have abhored.

Copernicus was a polymath, but his day job was physician. If he could advise us today, I imagine his first prescription would be to eat healthy, exercise, and pray. After that, his "principle" might be to cherish God's creation by studying the sky and helping other people. I am agnostic - I am not a "principled Copernican" - but I object to those who would twist his ideas 180 degrees, assuming his historical views (especially his faith and his many other accomplishments) are irrelevant. It is an intellectual crime to rewrite the past so we can pretend to agree with it.

It is time to resurrect and restore the actual Copernican Principle as a monument to the actual genius who risked everything to promote it, and assign new names like "The Sagan Principle" to more ephemeral ideological speculation. The Catholic Church has been unjustly accused of persecuting Galileo for his science (instead of his obstreperousness). Perhaps it is time for the Vatican astromomer brothers to restore and defend one of their own.

CopernicanPrinciple (last edited 2015-08-05 23:31:49 by KeithLofstrom)