Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2015-06-09 02:15:34
Size: 1012
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2015-06-09 02:21:30
Size: 1132
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
claims the equations below are found here: shows the three equations below, and claims they are found here:
Line 15: Line 15:
but I don't see them in that three equation form. but I don't see them in that three equation form.  I suspect these are versions from a more recent paper.
Line 18: Line 18:
$ \ddot x - 2 \omega \dot y - 3 \omega^2 x ~=~ f_x ~~~~ $ x is the radial direction
Line 19: Line 20:
$ \ddot x - 2 \omega \dot y - 3 \omega^2 x = f_x $  ... x is the radial direction $ \ddot y + 2 \omega \dot x ~=~ f_y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ $ y is the orbital direction
Line 21: Line 22:
$ \ddot y + 2 \omega \dot x = f_y $ ... y is the orbital direction

$ \ddot z + \omega^2 z f_z $ ... z is perpendicular to the orbital plane. Right handed triad mentioned in Burns, the equation works with left triad, too.
$ \ddot z + \omega^2 z ~=~ f_z ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ $ z is perpendicular to the orbital plane. Right handed triad mentioned in Burns, the equation works with left triad, too.

Hills Equations

There's a name for objects in "toroidal orbits" - Hill's equations, in the "Hill's frame."

This paper:

shows the three equations below, and claims they are found here:

but I don't see them in that three equation form. I suspect these are versions from a more recent paper.

\ddot x - 2 \omega \dot y - 3 \omega^2 x ~=~ f_x ~~~~ x is the radial direction

\ddot y + 2 \omega \dot x ~=~ f_y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ y is the orbital direction

\ddot z + \omega^2 z ~=~ f_z ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ z is perpendicular to the orbital plane. Right handed triad mentioned in Burns, the equation works with left triad, too.

HillsEquations (last edited 2016-04-14 03:22:38 by KeithLofstrom)