Differences between revisions 3 and 5 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2017-11-09 23:56:41
Size: 2190
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2017-11-09 23:57:49
Size: 2175
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * NASA: October 4, 2017:  [[ https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=6963 | Mysterious Dimming of Tabby's Star May Be Caused by   Dust ]]  * NASA: October 4, 2017:[[https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=6963 | Mysterious Dimming of Tabby's Star May Be Caused by Dust ]]
Line 10: Line 9:
 * Tabor, Abby (5 October 2017). [[ https://phys.org/news/2017-10-scientific-quest-kepler-enigmatic.html | "The scientific quest to explain Kepler's most enigmatic find" Phys.org ]]  * Tabor, Abby (5 October 2017). [[ https://phys.org/news/2017-10-scientific-quest-kepler-enigmatic.html | "The scientific quest to explain Kepler's most enigmatic find" ]]

KIC 8462852, Tabby's Star

So, Tabby's star is interesting, and we have more to learn. Will the dust cloud eventually collapse into a planetoid, millions of years from now? Not enough data to model that yet, but we can gather plenty more over the coming centuries.


  • Some speculated a "Dyson Sphere"... which Freeman Dyson calls a "shell", a collection of synchronized orbiting objects, and attributed to the 1937 novel Star Maker by Olaf Stapledon. "Sphere" is a misnomer from a sloppy journalist, implying a solid shell. Without a source of internal support, no shell made of any material we know about can support itself against the gravity of a star.

O39TabbyStar (last edited 2017-11-10 00:35:52 by KeithLofstrom)