Pacific DC Intertie

Secondary information, mostly from wikipedia.

Length

1362 km

Conductor Cross Section

1171 mm2

?? are these "circular mm2" ??

Power

3100 MW

Voltage (bipolar)

±500 KV

assumed at transmit end

Aluminum density

2700kg/m3

Resistivity of Aluminum

2.65E-8Ωm

at 20C, varies with temperature

temperature coefficient

3.8E-3/C

W.A.G. estimates

Resistivity at 50C

3.15E-8Ωm

temperature wild guess

Current (bipolar)

3100A

Resistance per kilometer

0.027Ω

Voltage drop per km

84V

Power dissipation

260 W/m

Total voltage drop/leg

114KV

Efficiency

77%

Aluminum volume, cables

3200 m3

Not including towers, etc

Aluminum mass, cables

8600 tonnes

Assuming a steel core with the same cross section of the outer aluminum, then the total cables cross section is 2340 mm2, for a diamter of 5.5cm and a surface area of 0.17m2/m . The cables would radiate/convect 1500W/m2 or 0.15W/cm2, which probably makes them hot but not terribly hot (which would cause them to sag a lot).

These are estimates. I would love to see actual measurements or more accurate estimates, especially for the temperature.

Why does this matter?

Moving energy from rectennas, or hypothetical solar arrays in New Mexico and Texas, will involve huge amounts of power transmission. Power Loop energy storage and transmission will be good in the long term (if we can dig the tunnels!) but for the next few decades the United States will be moving 1000GW peak demand power over wire. If we power with daylight solar, in the winter, and feed the power to some hypothetical energy storage system elsewhere (no pumped hydro in New Mexico!), then we will need to move perhaps 2500GW during peak times, almost 800 times the Pacific DC capacity, for 50% more distance to, say, Chicago. Estimate 1000x more aluminum in the wires, assuming higher voltage and efficiency improvements. Given that hypothetical pumped storage systems will be in huge mountain valleys, probably massively artificial ones in the Rockies far from the population centers on the East Coast, and will also add significant inefficiencies, this could be too low by a factor of 2. If we replace significant amounts of heat and transportation fuel with electricity, it could be too low by a factor of 5 or more.

The United States produced 1.76 million tons (2000 lbs) or 1.6 million metric tonnes of aluminum in 2010. We would need more than 5 years of current aluminum production to make 8.6 million tonnes of aluminum power transmission line. Assume this is rolled out over 10 years, for a production increase of 860 thousand tonnes per year, or an average of 10 extra tonnes per hour. Aluminum requires 15kWh/kg to produce (not including the coking electrodes) so that is 1.5GW of additional electric generation on average. We may be able to power the pot lines directly from solar cells without storage and limit production to daytime, for about 5GW peak load. Compared to the other big numbers, at least that is affordable!