Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2014-05-26 18:32:24
Size: 1801
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2014-05-26 20:20:24
Size: 2757
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
=== Space Power Satellites Bands === === The Analemma ===

A lightweight space power satellite under light pressure cannot remain in a stationary spot without large expenditures of delta V. [[ LightOrbit | Similar to a server sky array]], it will need to be in an elliptical orbit, with perigee towards the sun. Assume 15e6 m^2^ area and 40e6 kg, sail ratio 0.375 for a big SSPS array. GEO circular orbit velocity (sidereal) is 3075 m/s. The eccentricity is 3 * 4.56e-6 * 0.375 * 3.156e7 / 4 π 3075 = 4.2e-3 .

=== Space Power Satellite Bands ===
Line 31: Line 35:

If rectennas are as simple as a vast field of dipoles and diodes, then they will make a '''huge''' third and fifth harmonic emission; they will not be all-frequency zero emission surfaces. So, they will reflect some first harmonic energy away from GEO, but the third and fifth harmonics will form a dense array of very high power grating lobes, scanning through the sky as the incidence angle of energy from the powersat changes, as it follows its daily analemma.

Space Based Solar Power Radio Interference

Work in progress, may be many errors

The Analemma

A lightweight space power satellite under light pressure cannot remain in a stationary spot without large expenditures of delta V. Similar to a server sky array, it will need to be in an elliptical orbit, with perigee towards the sun. Assume 15e6 m2 area and 40e6 kg, sail ratio 0.375 for a big SSPS array. GEO circular orbit velocity (sidereal) is 3075 m/s. The eccentricity is 3 * 4.56e-6 * 0.375 * 3.156e7 / 4 π 3075 = 4.2e-3 .

Space Power Satellite Bands

1st

3rd

5th

5.729

17.187

28.645

tanaka

5.800

17.240

29.000

5.810

17.430

29.050

C band

Ku band

Ka band

Broadband satellite systems typically employ the 27.5-30.0 GHz SHF frequency range for uplink transmissions (earth-to-space) and the 17.7-20.2 GHz range for downlink transmissions (space-to-earth)

Distance from GEO to 45N, 38000 km, 1.8e16 m2. 1W EIRP produces 5.5e-17 W/m2 or 5.5e-18 mW/cm2 at antenna dish.

2GW powersat produces 30mW/cm2, 300W/m2 an EIRP of 187 dbW on beam. Sidelobe power is 0.01mW/cm2 or 0.1 W/m2, an EIRP of 153 dBW, and the "floor" is 100nW/cm2, 1μW/m2, an EIRP of 103 dBW.

I don't know how much we must filter this spike of energy to keep it from degrading a signal. Chances are, a pure tone won't land directly in the signal band, but nonlinearities in LNA and mixer could shift the frequency into the baseband. Let's be very optimistic and assume that we can tolerate a signal or harmonic of the same power as the comsat signal.

Satellite EIRP

Attenuation needed from

dBW

factor

mW/cm2

187dBW

153dBW

103dBW

20

100

5.5e-16

167dB

133dB

83dB

25

314

1.7e-15

162dB

128dB

78dB

30

1000

5.5e-15

157dB

123dB

73dB

35

3142

1.7e-14

152dB

118dB

68dB

40

10000

5.5e-14

147dB

113dB

63dB

45

31420

1.7e-13

142dB

108dB

58dB

50

100000

5.5e-13

137dB

103dB

53dB

If rectennas are as simple as a vast field of dipoles and diodes, then they will make a huge third and fifth harmonic emission; they will not be all-frequency zero emission surfaces. So, they will reflect some first harmonic energy away from GEO, but the third and fifth harmonics will form a dense array of very high power grating lobes, scanning through the sky as the incidence angle of energy from the powersat changes, as it follows its daily analemma.

SbspInterference (last edited 2015-05-19 15:05:26 by KeithLofstrom)